Log in to see which of your friends have seen this movie
More info & statistics
7.9% of the viewers favorited this title, 1.1% disliked it
Currently in 24 official lists, but has been in 33
Activity
coolathlon added this title to their watchlist
6 hours agoRvSteenhoven checked this title
yesterdaybeto tarantella favorited this title
3 days agobeto tarantella checked this title
3 days agoxrobin87x favorited this title
3 days agobaraka92 commented on this title
4 days agoFriends
Sight & Sound's The...
807 movies · At #8
TSPDT's 1,000...
1001 movies · At #9
Cahiers du Cinéma's...
100 movies · At #10
AFI's 100...
100 movies · At #12
Halliwell's Top...
1043 movies · At #16
A Personal Journey...
99 movies · At #17
Library of...
856 movies · At #20
IMDb's Western Top 50
50 movies · At #20
Taschen's 100...
100 movies · At #40
Leonard Maltin's 100...
100 movies · At #65
BFI's 100 Road Movies
100 movies · At #71
BFI's 100 Westerns
100 movies · At #77
Roger Ebert's Great Movies
410 movies · At #144
Empire's The 500...
500 movies · At #164
Mark Cousins's The...
522 movies · At #212
BFI's 360 Classic...
365 movies · At #248
1001 Movies You Must...
1009 movies · At #303
Jonathan Rosenbaum's...
1133 movies · At #411
Jennifer Eiss's 500...
502 movies · At #441
Emma Beare's 501...
502 movies · At #466
David Thomson's Have...
1011 movies · At #530
The New York Times's...
1001 movies · At #754
The Guardian's 1000...
1004 movies · At #789
ShotMarvinInTheFace
Dated and silly. John Wayne's character is very unlikable. He is not a flawed character a la Travis Bickle, he is just a douche. And why did Debbie suddenly changed her mind and wanted to go back with Ethan and Martin?
Great cinematoraphy and composition. Poor acting, plot, and dialogue.. Did not really like this one
boulderman
Watched this got a second time after ten year gap, still didn't find it to be brilliant, too tongue in cheek.
mussels
This is one of the only "great" movies whose place in various Top 250 lists I question. There are many well-regarded movies which I don't personally care for while still acknowledging the greatness of the films themselves: their story, acting, production, direction, cinematography, etc.
But The Searchers?
The overall story is indeed pretty epic, and it has that going for it, but the details of the story just didn't work. The movie does little to convince me why John Wayne and his sidekick would spend so many . . . not months . . . but YEARS searching for the lost girl. After each "two years later" kind of jump in the story, I kept asking "why?!?"
Also, the rampant sexism and racism may have been acceptable in 1953, and I can almost always forgive it in other classic movies because those aspects reflected the values at the time the films were made, but I feel like The Searchers takes it one step too far by twisting a lot of the sexist and racist comments and actions into slapstick humour attempts. Okay, so in 1953 many Americans felt that a Comanche woman is a lower life form than a white man – I get that – and so the characters are going to treat her in a condescending way. But depicting white men kicking a Comanche woman down a hill while laughing at the situation (and judging by the sound effects and music at that time, expecting me to laugh at it as well) was just shameful, by any standards. It would be as if a sad trombone sound played every time a slave was whipped in a pre-civil war movie. Sure, show it like it is, but don't make a joke out of it. I just can't forgive it. Other attempts at humour in the movie were less offensive, but still tacky, in my opinion.
And lastly, Monument Valley, Utah, is far too iconic to pass as Texas; it would be like shooting a "New York" movie right next to the Eiffel Tower in Paris. It may look nice, but it just doesn't fit.
By all accounts, this isn't a "bad" movie, but I wonder how much of its Top 250 status is due to nostalgia (it's John Wayne's biggest movie!!!) as opposed to true critical opinion.