kellyoung

By far the most shamelessly self-indulgent movie I've ever seen. That doesn't make it bad. It's beautifully shot and has some fun moments, but three hours is an awfully long time to watch rich people be capricious.

5 years ago

K.

Too many people are missing the point. The film is a critique of the mainstream world's descent into superficiality, conformity, materialism, and self indulgence, showcasing this descent through the Hollywood/journalist lifestyles, and hereby also displaying the influence/effect these lifestyles have in our societies. The film brings to awareness the vanity of celebrity culture by taking place within it, and non-judgmentally observes the lives that are lost within the self-indulgence of it. Fellini exposed the lie that the so-called elite lead the perfect life, revealing in truth that the extravagance of their lives is nothing but a façade for their superficiality. Most of all this is a film about self-boredom, lack of satisfaction, and the vain search for satisfaction through conformity and superficial relationships.

3 years ago

fonz

A critique of a societal group works if the group in question can understand the comments. Here it only feels like they are in on the joke, the rest of us unwashed masses trample over each other to get a piece of a "miracle tree."

I can appreciate the technical skill on display and the cinematography was good but I feel that people are too afraid of having a dissenting opinion. I understood most of the main points the film was making, I just didn't care. In order for me to sit through an over-long, self-indulgent, jerk-off fest, I have to sympathize with one of the characters, particularly the main one. Marcello wasn't particularly compelling and you never see him actually working (writing; interesting note, when I had the thought of when is he going to actually write something, the very next scene was of him sitting in a cafe failing to writing anything), so his existential crisis, which seems neatly resolved by the end, comes across as tedious.

There were three stand-out scenes that I enjoyed. The opening sequence with Jesus, Steiner's party monologue and the very last bit with the monster on the beach. More than any other parts, they supported the auteur's vision, however they cannot be viewed in a vacuum and need to be taken in with the drawn-out whole.

And to think that I put off seeing this for so long, just to have an opportunity to experience it in its intended format, is very anti-climatic.

5 years ago

More info & statistics

10.1% of the viewers favorited this title, 1% disliked it

Currently in 20 official lists, but has been in 26

Activity

comaland8 checked this title

2 days ago

d_arkin1989 checked this title

2 days ago

Gabriel Schaf checked this title

2 days ago

willowandglass checked this title

4 days ago

punkfrud checked this title

5 days ago

Colblimp1 checked this title

5 days ago

Friends

Log in to see which of your friends have seen this movie

FilmTV's The Best...

100 movies · At #1

Roger Ebert's Great Movies

410 movies · At #9

Empire's The 100...

105 movies · At #11

Spike Lee's...

94 movies · At #22

Cannes Film Festival...

92 movies · At #25

TSPDT's 1,000...

1001 movies · At #29

Sight & Sound's The...

807 movies · At #36

Taschen's 100...

100 movies · At #47

IMDb's 1960s Top 50

50 movies · At #50

Empire's The 500...

500 movies · At #55

Cahiers du Cinéma's...

100 movies · At #59

Roy Menarini's Il...

250 movies · At #70

Leonard Maltin's 100...

100 movies · At #73

The New York Times's...

1001 movies · At #227

The Guardian's 1000...

1004 movies · At #258

Time Out's 1000...

1033 movies · At #264

1001 Movies You Must...

1007 movies · At #352

UNESCO's Memory of...

911 movies · At #479

David Thomson's Have...

1011 movies · At #585

The Criterion Collection

1273 movies · At #859