Michelangelo Antonioni's Cannes statement - "Today the world is endangered by an extremely serious split between a science that is totally and consciously projected into the future, and a rigid and stereotyped morality that all of us recognize as such and yet sustain out of cowardice and sheer laziness. Where is this split most evident? What are its most obvious, its most sensitive, let us even say its most painful, areas?

Consider the Renaissance man, his sense of joy, his fullness, his multifarious activities. Those were men of great magnitude, technically able and at the same time artistically creative, capable of feeling their own sense of dignity, their own sense of importance as human beings, the Ptolemaic fullness of man. Then man discovered that his world was Copernican, an extremely limited world in an unknown universe.

And today a new man is being born, fraught with all the fears and terrors and stammerings that are associated with a period of gestation. And what is even more serious, this new man immediately finds himself burdened with a heavy baggage of emotional traits that cannot exactly be called old and outmoded but rather unsuited and inadequate. They condition us without offering us any help; they create problems without suggesting any possible solutions. And yet it seems that man will not rid himself of this baggage. He reacts, he loves, he hates, he suffers under the sway of moral forces and myths that today, when we are at the threshold of reaching the moon, should not be the same as those that prevailed at the time of Homer, but nevertheless are.

Man is quick to rid himself of his technological and scientific mistakes and misconceptions. Indeed, science has never been more humble and less dogmatic than it is today. Whereas our moral attitudes are governed by an absolute sense of stultification. In recent years, we have examined these moral attitudes very carefully, we have dissected them and analyzed them to the point of exhaustion. We have been capable of all this, but we have not been capable of finding new ones. We have not been capable of making any headway whatsoever toward a solution to this problem, of this ever-increasing split between moral man and scientific man, a split that is becoming more and more serious and more and more accentuated.

Naturally, I don’t care to, nor can I, resolve it myself; I am not a moralist, and my film is neither a denunciation nor a sermon. It is a story told in images whereby, I hope, it may be possible to perceive not the birth of a mistaken attitude but the manner in which attitudes and feelings are misunderstood today. Because, I repeat, the present moral standards we live by, these myths, these conventions, are old and obsolete. And we all know they are, yet we honor them. Why? The conclusion reached by the protagonists in my film is not one of sentimentality. If anything, what they finally arrive at is a sense of pity for each other. You might say that this too is nothing new. But what else is left if we do not at least succeed in achieving this? Why do you think eroticism is so prevalent today in our literature, our theatrical shows, and elsewhere? It is a symptom of the emotional sickness of our time. But this preoccupation with the erotic would not become obsessive if Eros were healthy, that is, if it were kept within human proportions. But Eros is sick; man is uneasy, something is bothering him. And whenever something bothers him, man reacts, but he reacts badly, only on erotic impulse, and he is unhappy.

The tragedy in L’avventura stems directly from an erotic impulse of this type: unhappy, miserable, futile. To be critically aware of the vulgarity and the futility of such an overwhelming erotic impulse, as is the case with the protagonist in L’avventura, is not enough or serves no purpose. And here we witness the crumbling of a myth that proclaims it is enough for us to know, to be critically conscious of ourselves, to analyze ourselves, in all our complexities and in every facet of our personality. The fact of the matter is that such an examination is not enough. It is only a preliminary step. Every day, every emotional encounter gives rise to a new adventure. For even though we know that the ancient codes of morality are decrepit and no longer tenable, we persist, with a sense of perversity that I would only ironically define as pathetic, in remaining loyal to them. Thus moral man, who has no fear of the scientific unknown, is today afraid of the moral unknown. Starting out from this point of fear and frustration, his adventure can only end in a stalemate."

2 years ago


That felt long..

7 years ago


So many well-dressed men and women, handsome architecture, scenic landscapes, and beautiful language. Is this why I liked the movie? It was splendid!

9 years ago

More info & statistics

11.3% of the viewers favorited this title, 1.2% disliked it

Currently in 23 official lists, but has been in 28


Finwe checked this title


comaland8 checked this title

2 days ago

Luca Canali checked this title

2 days ago

rspitzer checked this title

3 days ago

willowandglass checked this title

4 days ago

magdiragdag checked this title

6 days ago


Log in to see which of your friends have seen this movie

FilmTV's The Best...

100 movies · At #9

Roger Ebert's Great Movies

410 movies · At #10

Roy Menarini's Il...

250 movies · At #24

Sight & Sound's The...

807 movies · At #26

Cahiers du Cinéma's...

100 movies · At #36

Amos Vogel's Film as...

597 movies · At #37

TSPDT's 1,000...

1001 movies · At #38

Empire's The 100...

105 movies · At #44

Arts & Faith's Top...

100 movies · At #45

The New York Times's...

1001 movies · At #47

Taschen's 100...

100 movies · At #48

Time Out's 1000...

1033 movies · At #52

The Guardian's 1000...

1004 movies · At #61

The Criterion Collection

1273 movies · At #102

Harvard's Suggested...

348 movies · At #150

BFI's 360 Classic...

365 movies · At #278

Empire's The 500...

500 movies · At #286

1001 Movies You Must...

1007 movies · At #348

Jonathan Rosenbaum's...

1133 movies · At #446

UNESCO's Memory of...

911 movies · At #478

Cahiers du Cinéma's...

561 movies · At #492

Halliwell's Top...

1043 movies · At #509

David Thomson's Have...

1011 movies · At #581